You're here: My Science Blogging » Sci&Tech History » Article: Performance Indicators for Applied R&D
yuti — April 19, 2008 / 1:25 am
Score, rank and number are always become our concern rather to decide something is good or bad. The question is how this score, rank, and number been accepted and constructed? Moreover, who have the ‘right’ to do that and what aspects need to be highlighted? As mentioned earlier, Latour pointed four professionals to be taken care of: scientist, economist, moralist and politicians. In university field, answers to these question become important to decide indicators that would be used to assess university performance.
As stated in Center for Science and Technology Studies (CEST), in some countries in Europe, Australia, New Zealand there are some translation used to assess the university performance from paper publications to research collaboration with the industry. This parameter indicate a shifting paradigm among scholar from science for the science sake to science for human welfare.
Post to: delicious, Digg, ma.gnolia, Stumbleupon
Search only in this blog
Search across Asia Blogging Network
More? Go to Asia Blogging Network Column section.
ibnusomowiyono on Persuasive Technology & Consumerism suwanto on Constructivist, Gender & Number kristo on Communication, Medium & Culture hendy on Control vs Qualculation: Bio energy Case Cady on Bio energy Scientist Modulation: An Actor Network Approach Eric on The Love of Technology yuti on Batik Fractal: Marriage between Science & Art pixelpeople project on Batik Fractal: Marriage between Science & Art yuti on Batik Fractal: Marriage between Science & Art pixelpeople project on Batik Fractal: Marriage between Science & ArtA feed could not be found at http://3gweek.net/feed/
A feed could not be found at http://feeds.feedburner.com/transjogja
Ikuti diskusi, tuliskan komentar Anda.